TASK - Explore the ways in which the theme of RESPONSIBILITY is presented
to the audience in the play.
To begin with, it is absolutely essential that you
understand the background to this play. The best way for you to get your heads
around this will be for me to take some snippets from BBC’s Bitesize site,
which sums up the issues surrounding this play nicely.
It is essential that your introduction outlines these
issues:
*What was the world like when the play was written?
*What was it like when the play was set?
*What are the playwright’s main messages and lessons to the
watching audience?
Etc.
John Boynton Priestley was born in Yorkshire
in 1894. He knew early on that he wanted to become a writer, but decided
against going to university as he thought he would get a better feel for the
world around him away from academia. Instead, he
became a junior clerk with a local wool firm at the age of 16.
When the
First World War broke out, Priestley joined the infantry and only just escaped
death on a number of occasions. After the war, he gained a degree from Cambridge University ,
then moved to London
to work as a freelance writer. He wrote successful articles and essays, then
published the first of many novels, The Good Companions, in 1929. He wrote
his first play in 1932 and went on to write 50 more. Much of his writing was
ground-breaking and controversial. He included new ideas about possible
parallel universes and strong political messages.
During
the Second World War he broadcast a massively popular weekly radio programme
which was attacked by the Conservatives as being too left-wing. The programme
was eventually cancelled by the BBC for being too critical of the Government.
He
continued to write into the 1970s, and died in 1984.
During the 1930's Priestley became very concerned about
the consequences of social inequality in Britain, and in 1942 Priestley and
others set up a new political party, the Common Wealth Party, which argued for
public ownership of land, greater democracy, and a new 'morality' in politics.
The party merged with the Labour Party in 1945, but Priestley was influential
in developing the idea of the Welfare State which began to be put into place at
the end of the war.
He
believed that further world wars could only be avoided through cooperation and
mutual respect between countries, and so became active in the early movement
for a United Nations. And as the nuclear arms race between West and East began
in the 1950s, he helped to found CND, hoping that Britain would set an example to the
world by a moral act of nuclear disarmament.
This was the period of the Russian Revolution, two
appalling world wars, the Holocaust and the Atom Bomb.
This
table describes what society was like in 1912 and in 1945
An Inspector Callsis set in 1912
|
An Inspector Calls was written in 1945.
|
Images
|
The First World War would start in two
years. Birling's optimistic view that there would not be a war is completely
wrong.
|
The Second World War ended in
|
|
There were strong distinctions between the
upper and lower classes.
|
Class distinctions had been greatly
reduced as a result of two world wars.
|
|
Women were subservient to men. All a well
off women could do was get married; a poor woman was seen as cheap labour.
|
As a result of the wars, women had earned
a more valued place in society.
|
|
The ruling classes saw no need to change
the status quo.
|
There was a great desire for social
change. Immediately after The Second World War, Clement Attlee's Labour Party
won a landslide victory over Winston Churchill and the Conservatives.
|
|
Priestley
deliberately set his play in 1912 because the date represented an era when all
was very different from the time he was writing. In 1912, rigid class and
gender boundaries seemed to ensure that nothing would change. Yet by 1945, most
of those class and gender divisions had been breached. Priestley wanted to make
the most of these changes. Through this play, he encourages people to seize the
opportunity the end of the war had given them to build a better, more caring
society.
Bitesize also offers some points/notes about responsibility
which will be worth reading to help with your planning etc:
In An Inspector Calls, the central theme
is responsibility. Priestley is
interested in our personal responsibility for our own actions and our
collective responsibility to society. The play explores the effect of class,
age and sex on people's attitudes to
responsibility, and shows how prejudice can prevent people from acting
responsibly.
So, how does Priestley weave the themes
through the play?
Responsibility
The words responsible and responsibilityare used by most characters in the play at some point.
Each
member of the family has a different attitude to responsibility. Make sure that
you know how each of them felt about their responsibility in the case of Eva
Smith.
The
Inspector wanted each member of the family to share the responsibility of Eva's
death: he tells them,
"each of you helped to kill her."However, his final speech is aimed not only at the characters on stage, but at the audience too:
One Eva Smith has gone - but there are millions and
millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us, with
their lives, their hopes and fears, their suffering and chance of happiness,
all intertwined with our lives, and what we think and say and do.
The
Inspector is talking about a collective responsibility, everyone is society is
linked, in the same way that the characters are linked to Eva Smith. Everyone
is a part of
"one body", the Inspector sees society as more important than individual interests. The views he is propounding are like those of Priestley who was a socialist.
He adds a
clear warning about what could happen if, like some members of the family, we
ignore our responsibility:
And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men
will not learn that lesson, when they will be taught it in fire and blood and
anguish.
What
would Priestley have wanted his audience to think of when the Inspector warns
the Birlings of the
"fire and blood and anguish"?
Probably
he is thinking partly about the world war they had just lived through - the
result of governments blindly pursuing 'national interest' at all costs. No
doubt he was thinking too about the Russian revolution in which poor workers
and peasants took over the state and exacted a bloody revenge against the
aristocrats who had treated them so badly.
No comments:
Post a Comment